Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities. ®
- Digital Commons Network ™
International Business Commons ™
Based on downloads in June 2023
Regional Economic Integration , Kati Cole, Russell Lyons, Deborah Cary St. John Fisher University
Regional Economic Integration , Kati Cole, Russell Lyons, Deborah Cary
The review: a journal of undergraduate student research.
"In lieu of an abstract, below is the essay's first paragraph. Regional Economic Integration can best be defined as an agreement between groups of countries in a geographic region, to reduce and ultimately remove tariff and non-tariff barriers to the free flow of goods, services, and factors of production between each other.
Go to article
The Indulgence And Restraint Cultural Dimension: A Cross-Cultural Study Of Mongolia And The United States , Rentsenkhand Enkh-Amgalan East Tennessee State University
The Indulgence And Restraint Cultural Dimension: A Cross-Cultural Study Of Mongolia And The United States , Rentsenkhand Enkh-Amgalan
Undergraduate honors theses.
This research focuses on one of the least studied cultural dimension, “indulgence versus restraint” (IVR) and how it affects consumer behavior, international marketing, and global business operations in the U.S. and Mongolia. This project is the first research on IVR in Mongolia since the country is rarely studied and there is no available data for this cultural dimension. Samples of undergraduate business students (as consumers) from both countries were studied through surveys. The findings support that Mongolians and Americans are different regarding the “indulgence” cultural dimension. This paper has a significant contribution to the cross-cultural literature regarding the indulgence cultural …
Managing Toxic Leaders: Dysfunctional Patterns In Organizational Leadership And How To Deal With Them , Marco Tavanti DePaul University
Managing Toxic Leaders: Dysfunctional Patterns In Organizational Leadership And How To Deal With Them , Marco Tavanti
This study reviews different typologies of toxic leaders in organizations-from bullies to narcissistic leaders. Unfortunately, toxic leaders are a painful but common reality in many organizations. Their destructive behaviors and dysfunctional personal characteristics often generate enduring poisonous effects on those they lead. They are identified by selfish outcomes in their decision-making and how they leave subordinates worse off than when they began. What distinguishes excellent from average managers is their ability to effectively manage dysfunctional leaders in the workplace. Even though some organizations may promote or simply tolerate toxic leaders for economic or political reasons, the long-term impact on the …
The Most Powerful Mouse In The World : The Globalization Of The Disney Brand , Michaela J. Robbins University of Tennessee, Knoxville
The Most Powerful Mouse In The World : The Globalization Of The Disney Brand , Michaela J. Robbins
Chancellor’s honors program projects.
No abstract provided.
The Walt Disney Company: A Corporate Strategy Analysis , Carlos Carillo, Jeremy Crumley, Kendree Thieringer, Jeffrey S. Harrison University of Richmond
The Walt Disney Company: A Corporate Strategy Analysis , Carlos Carillo, Jeremy Crumley, Kendree Thieringer, Jeffrey S. Harrison
Robins case network.
Walt Disney is a completely integrated media powerhouse. Films provide material for theme parks and resorts, consumer products, and even a cruise ship. Network and cable broadcasting is also a part of the integrated Disney package. None of Disney’s competitors are as successfully integrated. Still, in spite of a long record of success, Disney is facing more competition on many fronts and, like other media and entertainment companies, must continue to adapt to a changing technological and social environment.
Plan De Negocios Para La Creación De Un Depósito Dental Comercializador De Materiales Odontológicos Importados De Alemania Y Estados Unidos , Lina María Pérez Pacheco Universidad de La Salle, Bogotá
Plan De Negocios Para La Creación De Un Depósito Dental Comercializador De Materiales Odontológicos Importados De Alemania Y Estados Unidos , Lina María Pérez Pacheco
Finanzas y comercio internacional.
The Impact Of Culture On Business Negotiations , Nadia L. Gonzalez Grand Valley State University
The Impact Of Culture On Business Negotiations , Nadia L. Gonzalez
Understanding the impact of culture and cultural differences is essential in negotiations. Using both Hofstede’s cultural dimensions theory and the GLOBE Project’s nine cultural dimensions, this paper highlights the impact of culture in international business negotiations. After discussing the dimensions and various national attributes attributed to these dimensions, this paper highlights several important cultural strategies for firms to keep in mind when negotiating. It concludes with propositions and a discussion about how negotiators can improve their skills through an understanding and respect of cultural differences.
How Culture Makes A Difference In Management: Applying Geert Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions To Management In Germany And China , Brock Foster Eastern Michigan University
How Culture Makes A Difference In Management: Applying Geert Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions To Management In Germany And China , Brock Foster
Senior honors theses and projects.
Culture has been defined by many different individuals in a variety of fields with wide ranging definitions. The following paper will define culture and give the reader a framework at how to look at differences in cultures abroad. It will elaborate upon some cultural concepts of German and Chinese individuals and then go on to use Geert Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Theory to diagnose some of the issues that may arise when working with individuals identifying as German or Chinese. For the purpose of this paper, the individuals being referred to are the citizens in both the German and Chinese mainland. …
An Analysis Of Starbucks As A Company And An International Business , Lauren R. Roby Liberty University
An Analysis Of Starbucks As A Company And An International Business , Lauren R. Roby
Senior honors theses.
The researcher examines a detailed synopsis of the specialty coffee industry and the role that Starbucks plays in it. Starbucks is in a growth market, and it has a good relative overall position. The researcher will examine the business structure of Starbucks and the future implications of its current business strategies. By examining the strategic imperatives such as how to expand abroad and understanding the international context, the researcher will determine strong and weak business strategies of the company. Starbucks has overcome organizational and managerial implications that will serve as a strong model for international businesses. The researcher will then …
Essential Skills For Leadership Effectiveness In Diverse Workplace Development , Szu-Fang Chuang Fooyin University
Essential Skills For Leadership Effectiveness In Diverse Workplace Development , Szu-Fang Chuang
Online journal for workforce education and development.
Globalization, technology advances, and diversity have greatly influenced international business and multinational management operations. Global managers cannot consistently apply traditional leadership when dealing with multiple cultural conflicts and managing international employees in the rapidly changed diverse workplace. This study is an initial effort to examine the new looks of leadership in the diverse workplace development and identify essential leadership skills demanded in a global context. Global leaders need to develop cultural awareness, global mindset, interpersonal skill and effective manager-employee relationship in facing the changes and challenges of the global market. Eleven essential leadership skills for the global leaders to promote …
All Articles in International Business
2,860 full-text articles. Page 1 of 105 .
The Quick Service Food And Beverage Line Of Business And How It Is Aligned With The Overall Objectives For The Walt Disney World® Resort And The Walt Disney Company , Meghan McClure 2024 University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
The Quick Service Food And Beverage Line Of Business And How It Is Aligned With The Overall Objectives For The Walt Disney World® Resort And The Walt Disney Company , Meghan Mcclure
Management undergraduate honors theses.
The Disney College Program allows for many opportunities, such as instructor lead offerings, experiential learning, career path development, and academic support. This internship gives us hands-on work in a global company but also helps us further ourselves in our career by providing networking opportunities and behind-the-scenes access to things others may never experience.
As an intern in Food and Beverage, it was my job to provide not just food but experiences to guests from all around the world. It was my job not only to make sure guests left the restaurant locations happy, but also to maximize production. To do …
A Review Of Two Decades Of Research On Language In International Management (1997 - 2022) - Supplemental Material , Yung-Hwal Park, Kevin Lehnert 2023 Truman State University
A Review Of Two Decades Of Research On Language In International Management (1997 - 2022) - Supplemental Material , Yung-Hwal Park, Kevin Lehnert
Other faculty publications.
This research reviews over two decades of research on language within international management. This comprehensive review codes and summarizes 263 articles, highlighting the impact of language in various strategic areas of management: language policy; HRM and organizational behavior; internationalization; HQ-subsidiary relationship; knowledge sharing; corporate reporting and governance; and mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and inter-firm strategic collaboration. This study also highlights two major needs within the discipline (internal vs. external focus of language and level of analysis – individual, group and organizational), and addressed the call for a broader future research agenda.
Strategic Orientation And Absorptive Capacity: The Mediating Role Of Functional Conflict , Md Daud Ismail, Zurina Samsudin, Mohd Salekhan Othman, Roshayati binti Abdul Hamid 2023 Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Strategic Orientation And Absorptive Capacity: The Mediating Role Of Functional Conflict , Md Daud Ismail, Zurina Samsudin, Mohd Salekhan Othman, Roshayati Binti Abdul Hamid
The south east asian journal of management.
Research Aims: This study investigates the mediating role of functional conflict in explaining the effect of market orientation on the absorptive capacity of small and medium enterprises (SME) exporters in emerging markets.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The data were successfully collected from 124 respondents and tested using structural equation modelling via Smart-PLS.
Research Findings: The results support the notion that responsive market orientation and proactive market orientation positively influence absorptive capacity. In addition, functional conflicts serve as a quasi-mediator in the relationship between responsive market orientation and absorptive capacity.
Theoretical Contribution/Originality: The export competitiveness of SMEs is the output of intangible assets of …
Introduction To International Business , Rajaram Veliyath 2023 Kennesaw State University
Introduction To International Business , Rajaram Veliyath
Ksu distinguished course repository.
An introduction to the global business environment, this course examines the discrete and interactive effects of the geographic, historical, sociocultural, political/legal, economic and technological forces that shape business activities across borders and their consequences.
The Future Of U.S. Agricultural Biotechnology And Trade: Summary Of A Roundtable Discussion , 2023 University of Nebraska - Lincoln
The Future Of U.S. Agricultural Biotechnology And Trade: Summary Of A Roundtable Discussion
Yeutter institute publications.
The United States is one of the largest and highest-yield agricultural producers and exporters in the world. But the world’s population is growing, and growing conditions themselves are changing. Farms face shifting weather patterns, more frequent and severe storms, floods, and drought, and changing pest and disease pressures. What farmers plant and how they plant it are evolving to keep pace with these changes. Future global food security, sustainability, and U.S. leadership in agriculture will depend on the domestic and international policy and regulatory landscapes for agricultural biotechnology innovation. The Clayton Yeutter Institute of International Trade and Finance at the …
Towards A Model Of Follower Development: Exploring The Success Differentials In Leader And Follower Development Outcomes As Experienced By Bankers In Nigeria. , Chris O. Chukwuma 2023 Southeastern University - Lakeland
Towards A Model Of Follower Development: Exploring The Success Differentials In Leader And Follower Development Outcomes As Experienced By Bankers In Nigeria. , Chris O. Chukwuma
Phd in organizational leadership.
The aim of this qualitative study was to understand the leader and follower development experiences of middle-level managers in the Nigerian banking industry regarding developing followers into leaders. I used two research questions to explore the perception and treatment of followers and the levels of leader and follower development as influences on the development of followers into leaders. The research was set in Nigeria, with a purposive sample of middle-level managers in the Nigerian banking industry. I used a descriptive phenomenological technique to conduct long, deep interviews with 12 middle-level managers via Zoom video and then transcribed them with Otter.ai …
Building Strength Through Collaboration: What Faith Community Nurses Need To Know , MARCIA A. POTTER 2023 Syntact Solutions
Building Strength Through Collaboration: What Faith Community Nurses Need To Know , Marcia A. Potter
International journal of faith community nursing.
This article is a practical guide and viewpoint narrative that offers definitions, justifications for, process steps, and a how-to checklist for Faith Community Nurses considering collaboration between multiple agencies outside of their own. The author offers simple guidelines and how-to advice on securing success, avoiding risks, and preventing costly misunderstandings between cooperating agencies when combining resources.
Understanding Expatriates' Cultural Adjustment And Performance In International Assignments , Iskra Reic 2023 AstraZeneca UK Ltd
Understanding Expatriates' Cultural Adjustment And Performance In International Assignments , Iskra Reic
The qualitative report.
The aim of this research is to explore the experience of expatriates about cultural differences between home and host countries through a narrative inquiry. There is not enough information in the literature about expatriates’ experiences and how they see the role of cultural differences, cultural distance and cultural competences in adapting to international assignments. Therefore, main research question was how expatriates working in a large multinational pharmaceutical company perceive the role of cultural differences and cultural competencies in their adjustment and performance. A total of 12 expatriates from different home countries on assignment in different host countries participated in the …
The Provenances And Postscripts Of 1989 , Jokubas Salyga 2023 The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
The Provenances And Postscripts Of 1989 , Jokubas Salyga
Political science faculty publications and presentations.
The books under review exemplify some of the finest recent work on the historically informed political economy of Central and Eastern Europe. While different in their conceptual frameworks and geographical foci, the titles converge in the advancement of nuanced and convincing arguments, displaying both theoretical acuity and empirical depth to great effect. Bartel, Fabry, and Pula all share a resolute dedication to illuminating the under-explored provenances of neoliberalism and/or globalization in the region, that predate the annus mirabilis of 1989. Their contributions situate the ‘Eastern bloc’ states within the contours of evolving global political economy and the existential crises engulfing …
The Impact Of Fdi And Financial Depth On Eu Regional Growth: Income And Spatial Heterogeneity , Marialena Petrakou, Randolph Luca Bruno, Nick Phelps 2023 European Investment Bank, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
The Impact Of Fdi And Financial Depth On Eu Regional Growth: Income And Spatial Heterogeneity , Marialena Petrakou, Randolph Luca Bruno, Nick Phelps
Economic and business review.
Background and objective : The paper explores the impact of foreign direct investment and financial development on regional growth at the EU regional level for 2005–2017. Both FDI and financial development are important determinants of the regions’ growth, but not for all EU regions homogeneously. Some EU regions seem to benefit more than others, depending on certain characteristics, which implies that FDI attraction policies need to bear in mind not only country specificities, but also regional specificities, hence confirming the need for developing FDI attraction policies at the subnational level: financial development, capacity building, and Investment Promotion Agencies are key, …
Macroeconomic Drivers, Governance, And Foreign Direct Investment In Central And Eastern European Countries (Ceecs) , Parfait Bihkongnyuy Beri, Gabriel Mhonyera 2023 Nkafu Policy Institute, Economic Affairs, Yaoundé, Cameroon and Socio-Economic Research Applications and Projects, Washington, D.C, USA
Macroeconomic Drivers, Governance, And Foreign Direct Investment In Central And Eastern European Countries (Ceecs) , Parfait Bihkongnyuy Beri, Gabriel Mhonyera
Background and objective: The transition to market-oriented economies in CEECs entailed significant structural economic and institutional reforms. Over the past years, studies have investigated how these reforms affected foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows. However, the evidence remains debatable and varies across countries. This study provides new insights by considering the impact of macroeconomic factors, governance, and the moderating effect of governance on the macroeconomic drivers–FDI nexus.
Methods: A panel of 12 countries from 1991 to 2020 are analysed within the framework of conventional methods and Seemingly Unrelated Regression (SUR).
Results: Results robustly suggest that gross capital formation, macroeconomic stability, and …
The Impact Of Globalization On Domestic Growth In Africa , Thomas L. Ainscough, Todd M. Shank 2023 University of South Florida
The Impact Of Globalization On Domestic Growth In Africa , Thomas L. Ainscough, Todd M. Shank
Journal of global business insights.
Research into the impacts of globalization on domestic growth in Africa has been scarce and the results of the research that does exist have been mixed. This research addresses this gap in the literature by using the newly revised KOF Globalization Index to determine the impact of social, political, and financial globalization on African economies. The KOF Index was revised substantially in 2019. Our full data set includes 40 years of data, from 1980-2019. Findings indicate that the relationship between globalization and GDP is best represented by a non-linear cubic model. With that model, social globalization has become Africa’s most …
Trust Across Borders: A Review Of The Research On Interorganizational Trust In International Business , Tengjian ZOU, Gokhan ERTUG, Ilya R. P. CUYPERS, Donald L. FERRIN 2023 Zhejiang University
Trust Across Borders: A Review Of The Research On Interorganizational Trust In International Business , Tengjian Zou, Gokhan Ertug, Ilya R. P. Cuypers, Donald L. Ferrin
Research collection lee kong chian school of business.
Trust between organizations has been recognized as crucial in international business (IB) and has attracted extensive research attention. Researchers have conceptualized and measured interorganizational trust in multiple ways, investigated numerous determinants and outcomes of interorganizational trust, and explored interorganizational trust in several types of international relationships across a range of country combinations using varied research methodologies. Our review aims to consolidate and advance this literature by focusing on (i) how interorganizational trust has been conceptualized in IB; (ii) how interorganizational trust has been operationalized in IB; (iii) what factors promote or hinder interorganizational trust in IB; (iv) what the outcomes …
Trade Openness In China’S Economy: A Review Study , Joseph Asante Darkwah, David Boohene 2023 Zhejiang Gongshang University, China
Trade Openness In China’S Economy: A Review Study , Joseph Asante Darkwah, David Boohene
Interscience management review.
Trade openness has been established and documented to foster economic growth and development. However, this is coupled with problems. In this light, this paper employs a qualitative approach to review the relationship between trade openness and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflow, Economic growth and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions using China as the case study. The study revealed that trade openness has its benefits as well as its problems. That is, trade openness significantly influences economic growth, FDI, and the emission of CO2 in the atmosphere in China. Consequently, CO2, FDI, and economic growth are significantly influenced by China's level of …
Responses To General Capabilities Framework For Tertiary Education , Tony Shannon 2023 CESA Dean
Responses To General Capabilities Framework For Tertiary Education , Tony Shannon
International journal for business education.
The Australian Government Department of Education, Skills and Employment (DESE) is consulting on how best to develop a general capabilities framework for tertiary education. This is being done with NOUS, a business management consultancy, and the Assessment Research Centre of the University of Melbourne
Continuing Professional Development And The Commercial Education Society Of Australia , Kathleen McKenzie, Jacob Munday 2023 CESA
Continuing Professional Development And The Commercial Education Society Of Australia , Kathleen Mckenzie, Jacob Munday
The commercial education society of australia (cesa) was founded in 1910 and incorporated in 1911 as a non-profit company limited by guarantee. the mission of the society is to provide students with the opportunity to raise their standards of education so that they can take advantage of the opportunities for further education and employment. this is reflected in the society’s coat-of-arms ‘digne ambulate’ — walk worthily..
The Coaldrake And Joyce Reviews Into Australia's Tertiary Education Systems , Tony Shannon 2023 CESA Dean
The Coaldrake And Joyce Reviews Into Australia's Tertiary Education Systems , Tony Shannon
In October 2018 the Commonwealth Minister for Education, the Hon. Dan Tehan MP announced that Australia’s Higher Education Provider Category Standards will be reviewed to ensure the sector has the capacity to meet the evolving needs of students, employers and the wider community.
Affective And Psychomotor Taxonomies , Tony Shannon, Melvin Leong 2023 CESA Dean
Affective And Psychomotor Taxonomies , Tony Shannon, Melvin Leong
Taxonomies can sensitise teachers to develop their learners’ applications of their knowledge and skills in depth when utilised judiciously in preparing experiences for learning and assessments for evaluation (Tyszko and Sheets, 2019).
Short Courses And Digital Tertiary Education , Tony Shannon 2023 CESA Dean
Short Courses And Digital Tertiary Education , Tony Shannon
The Covid-19 pandemic has brought changes to many parts of our lives, particularly vocational and higher education. The changes have been positive and negative.
Group Learning And Tutoring , Tony Shannon 2023 CESA Dean
Group Learning And Tutoring , Tony Shannon
There are some academic subjects, particularly problem-based units, where group learning is beneficial, particularly as so much professional work is conducted in groups, whether formal or informal. These notes are merely an introductory outline to what can be an important element of some learning and assessment.
- Advertising and Promotion Management
- Arts Management
- Business Administration, Management, and Operations
- Business Analytics
- Business and Corporate Communications
- Business Intelligence
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics
- Corporate Finance
- Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations
- Fashion Business
- Finance and Financial Management
- Hospitality Administration and Management
- Human Resources Management
- Labor Relations
- Management Information Systems
- Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
- Nonprofit Administration and Management
- Operations and Supply Chain Management
- Organizational Behavior and Theory
- Other Business
- Portfolio and Security Analysis
- Real Estate
- Recreation Business
- Sales and Merchandising
- Sports Management
- Strategic Management Policy
- Technology and Innovation
- Tourism and Travel
- Transportation and Mobility Management
- International Business Research
IBR, Vol. 17, No. 1, February 2024: Call for Papers
Posted on Nov 5, 2023 International Business Research is now calling for papers for Vol. 17, No. 1, February 2024 issue. (Submission Deadline: January 1, 2024). If you are interested in submitting a manuscript to this... Read More
Recruitment for Reviewers
Posted on Feb 8, 2023 We are recruiting reviewers for the journal. If you are interested in becoming a reviewer, we welcome you to join us. Please find the application form and details at http://recruitment.ccsenet.org. Read More
Publishing Statistics 2022 Released
Posted on Jan 11, 2023 CCSE Publishing Statistics in 2022 has been released, please find the details at http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/announcements/reports Read More
Current: Vol. 16, No. 12 (2023)
- Body Language of Sellers and Its Impact on Customer Loyalty
- Ahmed R. Al-Owaidi
- Özgür Çengel
- A Multicriteria Evaluation of Local E-Government in Terms of Citizen Satisfaction
- Luís V. Tavares
- José A. Ferreira
- Ana M. Sá
- Ana C. Saraiva
- Vasco. B. Moreira
- Gonçalo M. Mendes
- Working Capital Management of Catering Enterprises Based on the Supply Chain — Taking the Jiumaojiu Group as an Example
- Guihang Guo
- Ying Li
- Yuerong Zheng
- The Multiple-Scenario Valuation Method: When Robust Strategy Meets Valuation Needs
- Andrea Beretta Zanoni
- Silvia Vernizzi
- Regulatory Requirements and Banks' Level of Risk
- Kevin Ghislain ADJE
- Gildas Essohouna MOUKPE
- The Impact of Migration on Financial Inclusion in Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Jasmina Džafić
- Lamija Gazić
- Are Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Shaping a New Risk Management Approach?
- Rosaria Cerrone
- Reviewer Acknowledgements for International Business Research, Vol. 16, No. 12
- Kevin Duran
Journal Publishing Workflow
Please see the workflow for the article publication:
Paper Selection and Publication Process
a). Upon receipt of paper submission, the Editorial Assistant sends an E-mail of confirmation to the corresponding author within 1-3 working days. If you fail to receive this confirmation, your submission/e-mail may have been missed. Please contact the Editor in time for that.
b). Peer review. We use the double-blind system for peer-review; both reviewers and authors’ identities remain anonymous. The paper will be peer-reviewed by three experts; two reviewers from outside and one editor from the journal typically involve in reviewing a submission. The review process may take 4-10 weeks.
c). Notification of the result of review by E-mail.
d). If the submission is accepted, the authors revise accordingly and pay the article processing charge (formatting and hosting).
e). A PDF version of the article is available for download on the journal’s webpage free of charge.
f). From July 1, 2018, we will not automatically provide authors free print journals. We will provide free print copies for authors who really need them. Authors are requested to kindly fill an application form to request free print copies. Additionally, we are happy to provide the journal’s eBook in PDF format for authors, free of charge. This is the same as the printed version.
The publisher and journal have a policy of “Zero Tolerance on the Plagiarism.” We check the plagiarism issue through two methods: reviewer check and plagiarism prevention tool ( ithenticate.com ).
All submissions will be checked by iThenticate before being sent to reviewers.
Each paper published in International Business Research is assigned a DOI ® number , which appears beneath the author's affiliation in the published paper. Click HERE to know what is DOI (Digital Object Identifier)? Click HERE to retrieve Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) for journal articles, books, and chapters.
- ISSN(Print): 1913-9004
- ISSN(Online): 1913-9012
- Started: 2008
- Frequency: bimonthly
h-index (December 2022): 91
i10-index (December 2022): 850
h5-index (December 2022): N/A
h5-median(December 2022): N/A
( The data was calculated based on Google Scholar Citations . Click Here to Learn More. )
- Academic Journals Database
- ANVUR (Italian National Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Research Institutes)
- CNKI Scholar
- Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB)
- EuroPub Database
- Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)
- Genamics JournalSeek
- Google Scholar
- Harvard Library
- Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD)
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB)
- The Keepers Registry
- UCR Library
- Universe Digital Library
- ZBW-German National Library of Economics
- Zeitschriften Daten Bank (ZDB)
- Kevin Duran Editorial Assistant
- [email protected]
- Journal Home
- Editorial Team
- Order Hard Copies
Browse Econ Literature
- Working papers
- Software components
- Book chapters
- JEL classification
- Subscribe to new research
- Economics Virtual Seminar Calendar NEW!
Inovatus Services Ltd.
Journal of international business research and marketing.
- Publisher Info
- Serial Info
Contact information of inovatus services ltd., serial information, impact factors.
- Simple ( last 10 years )
- Recursive ( 10 )
- Discounted ( 10 )
- Recursive discounted ( 10 )
- H-Index ( 10 )
- Euclid ( 10 )
- Aggregate ( 10 )
- By citations
- By downloads (last 12 months)
November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1
September 2021, volume 6, issue 6, july 2021, volume 6, issue 5, may 2021, volume 6, issue 4, march 2021, volume 6, issue 3, january 2021, volume 6, issue 2, november 2020, volume 6, issue 1, september 2020, volume 5, issue 6, july 2020, volume 5, issue 5, may 2020, volume 5, issue 4, march 2020, volume 5, issue 3, january 2020, volume 5, issue 2, november 2019, volume 5, issue 1, september 2019, volume 4, issue 6, july 2019, volume 4, issue 5, may 2019, volume 4, issue 4, march 2019, volume 4, issue 3, january 2019, volume 4, issue 2, november 2018, volume 4, issue 1, september 2018, volume 3, issue 6, july 2018, volume 3, issue 5, march 2018, volume 3, issue 3, january 2018, volume 3, issue 2, november 2017, volume 3, issue 1, september 2017, volume 2, issue 6, july 2017, volume 2, issue 5, may 2017, volume 2, issue 4, march 2017, volume 2, issue 3, january 2017, volume 2, issue 2, november 2016, volume 2, issue 1, september 2016, volume 1, issue 6, may 2016, volume 1, issue 4, march 2016, volume 1, issue 3, january 2016, volume 1, issue 2, november 2015, volume 1, issue 1, more services and features.
Follow serials, authors, keywords & more
Public profiles for Economics researchers
Various research rankings in Economics
Who was a student of whom, using RePEc
Curated articles & papers on economics topics
Upload your paper to be listed on RePEc and IDEAS
New papers by email
Subscribe to new additions to RePEc
Blog aggregator for economics research
Cases of plagiarism in Economics
Initiative for open bibliographies in Economics
News about RePEc
Questions about IDEAS and RePEc
Publishers indexing in RePEc
Found an error or omission?
Opportunities to help RePEc
Get papers listed
Have your research listed on RePEc
Open a RePEc archive
Have your institution's/publisher's output listed on RePEc
Get RePEc data
Use data assembled by RePEc
How to find journals, where to find articles, how to read a research article, selection of international research journals, news from the world.
- Statistics and market data
- In Finnish - Liiketoiminta Linkki avautuu uuteen ikkunaan
Search electronic and printed journals by journal title. Click journal title in SeAMK-Finna.
HBR - Harvard Business Review
HBR - Harvard Business Review is one of the leading professional business journals in the world. It's available for you in Business Source Elite.
- Professional / trade journals
- Research / Scholarly / Scientific / Academic journals
- Popular journals and magazines
- You can check the availability of the journal in SeAMK-Finna .
- It shows you if the library has purchased the journal either in printed or electronic form.
- Search SeAMK-Finna by the title of the journal.
- Most research journals and plenty of other journal types are available in electronic form. Most of the journals are in the licenced based databases which are offered to you by SeAMK library services. E-journals are available at the university's computer network and through remote access on mobile devices and computers at home.
- Printed journals are mainly Finnish and they are located in Tapio-sali (Campus House). They not available for loan but it's possible to make photocopies in the library. You can also scan articles to your email or flash drive. Photocopies cost but scanning is free of charge.
- Open access (OA) journals are freely available on the internet.. Directory of open access journals: DOAJ
- Search by SeAMK-Finna International e-materials search - search multiple databases at the same time
- For more systematic and precise search use the following databases listed below:
How to read research articles?
Research articles are valuable information sources for academic purposes.
- Original research articles report the results of the original research.
- Review articles summarize the results and conclusions from multiple original research articles.
- Peer reviewed articles are closely examined by a panel of reviewers who are experts on the article's topic to ensure the article's quality.
Start reading a research article by skimming the following sections:
- Abstract: tells briefly what was done and what was found.
- Introduction: explains motivation and importance of research and provides background information by describing and explaining the prior research.
- Methods: gives details on how the experiment was set up and carried out.
- Results: provide the raw data. Figures and tables provide the data in a compact format for easy viewing.
- Discussion: summarizes important results and gives reasons for conclusions.
- References / Bibliography: allows you find the sources used and evaluate whether those sources seem reliable and accurate.
- Find out more about reading the research articles: How to read a research article (Tim Lockman, Kishwaukee College Library, Video 5:10)
- European Journal of Marketing
- Human Resource Management International Digest
- I nternational Entrepreneurship and Management Journal (full-text delayed 1 year)
- International Small Business Journal
- Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change
- Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing
- Journal of Electronic Commerce Research
- Journal of Business Strategy
- Journal of International Business Studies (full-text delayed 1 year)
- Journal of International Marketing
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Journal of Services Marketing
- Journal of Strategic Marketing (full-text delayed 18 months)
- Journal of Strategy and Management
- Strategy & Leadership
- Financial Times
- << Edellinen: Books
- Seuraava: Statistics and market data >>
- Päivitetty viimeksi: Oct 16, 2023 1:26 PM
- URL: https://seamk.libguides.com/internationalbusiness
International business research: The real challenges are data and theory
- Open access
- Published: 30 October 2022
- volume 53 , pages 2068–2087 ( 2022 )
You have full access to this open access article
- Jean-François Hennart 1 , 2 &
- Dylan Sutherland 3
Explore all metrics
Cite this article
We agree with Aguinis and Gabriel that, contrary to Eden and Nielsen, international business (IB) is not uniquely complex, but argue that it faces two unique challenges. First, because it deals with cross-country phenomena, IB data are less plentiful and reliable. Second, because IB uses many imported theories, and they tend to be influenced by the national environment of their authors, they often have, taken as is, limited applicability in many of the contexts IB studies. We illustrate our twin points by examining the secondary data used in IB to measure the economic activities of multinational enterprises outside their home country, both at the country level, using foreign direct investment (FDI) data from balance of payments statistics, and at the firm level, using firm-level databases such as Orbis. We document the serious shortcomings of FDI data and the problems encountered in using firm-level data. We then highlight some of the cultural biases inherent in Williamson’s version of transaction cost theory (TCT) but show how they can be overcome to arrive at a richer and more general theory that is applicable to a wider variety of contexts.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
In a recent article in the Journal of International Business Studies, Eden and Nielsen ( 2020 : 1610) write that “complexity is the underlying cause of the unique methodological problems facing international business research.” For them, international business (IB) research is uniquely complex because of its multiplicity, multiplexity, and dynamism: IB researchers need to take into account multiple actors, engaged in multiple relationships, which unfold over time. Aguinis and Gabriel ( 2021 ) counter that organizational behavior, strategic management, and entrepreneurship deal with similar complexity. We agree with them that research in IB is not necessarily more complex than that in other disciplines. Nonetheless, we believe that it is uniquely challenging for two main reasons. First, accessing reliable data on the questions IB researchers address, for example those related to MNE activity, is difficult. Second, IB scholars study contexts which often differ from those in which the theories they borrow have been elaborated. They must therefore modify or replace them to ensure local relevance and, even more challenging, greater generalizability. We first address some of the data issues faced by IB researchers and then discuss the challenges posed by theory.
IB scholars use primary data obtained through interviews and surveys, and secondary data from national statistical offices, international organizations, industry associations, commercial data providers, and firms via their annual reports and other regulatory filings.
Comparing primary data across countries, as IB must, is challenging because cultural factors make international comparison of responses to interviews and surveys difficult. Cross-national data equivalence requires that respondents of different cultures, often speaking different languages, understand and score survey questions the same way. This is problematic because respondents live and work in different contexts and hence might well be expected to interpret questions differently. The frequent need for translation also opens the door to variations in the way questions are understood. In addition, respondents in different countries are likely to also score differently. Japanese survey respondents are known to cluster their answers in the center of Likert scales, perhaps because Japanese culture values harmony and discourages extreme positions. This can lead to erroneous inferences (Hult et al., 2008 ). Yet data equivalence is imperative if one is to draw solid conclusions from studies that compare results across countries. Hult et al. ( 2008 ) concluded from a review of 167 studies using cross-cultural data between 1995 and 2005 that that challenge had not been taken as seriously by IB scholars as it should have been.
Secondary data are increasingly used in empirical IB research (Cerar, Nell & Reiche, 2021 ). The availability and reliability of such data poses its own challenges for IB scholars. Much of the data generated by national statistical offices has a national focus. IB phenomena are by definition international and hence at best partially covered by these data sources. Space constraints do not allow for a complete treatment here of all the problems caused by the use of secondary data in IB, so we focus instead on the measurement of just one IB construct, though undoubtedly a central one (Wilkins, 1997 ), the multinational enterprise (MNE), and more specifically, its activities outside its home country.
Measuring MNE foreign activity at the country level
Many IB research questions require data on the amount of economic activity (sales, value added, employment, investments) generated in a given host country by all the subsidiaries of MNEs based in another country. Dunning ( 1993 ), for example, attempts to determine the extent to which firms based in a given country have set up operations abroad, and where they have done it. Buckley et al. ( 2007 ) test a number of hypotheses on the factors that determine in which foreign countries Chinese firms operate. Researchers have also investigated which host-country characteristics affect their attractiveness to foreign investors (Habib & Zurawicki, 2002 ), and the effect of foreign-owned economic activity on various facets of host-country development (e.g., Kwok & Tadesse, 2006 ; Li & Liu, 2005 ).
Flows and stocks of foreign direct investment obtained from Balance of Payments statistics (hereafter FDI flow and stock data) have often, one could say predominantly, been used to measure the economic activity in a country of all the foreign subsidiaries of MNEs based in another country. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)’s yearly World Investment Report uses such data to document the level and evolution of the value of the activities of foreign firms in a host country. FDI flows and stocks have been used as dependent variables (e.g., Bruno, Campos & Estrin, 2021 ; Buckley et al., 2007 ; Mariotti & Marzano, 2021 ) as well as main independent variables (e.g., Kwok & Tadesse, 2006 ). As in the case of data equivalence in surveys on which we touched earlier, the IB literature has overlooked the serious problems inherent in using this type of data to measure the economic activities of MNE subsidiaries. 1 This is why we chose this as an example of the difficulty that IB researchers have in obtaining reliable data on the constructs they study.
FDI flow and stock data are collected by central banks to build their country’s balance of payments. FDI flows record the net value of financial transactions between two countries when the investor has control of the foreign investment (typically when it owns 10% or more of the equity of the foreign investment). FDI stocks record the value of the stake held in domestic firms by firms based in a foreign country. FDI flow and stock data are attractive as they are readily available for a large number of countries and can be downloaded for free from the websites of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the United Nations Commission for Trade and Development (UNCTAD), as well as those of national statistical offices. While ease of access is clearly a plus point, there are significant limitations to their use. Three of them apply to both flow and stock measures: FDI statistics only (1) record the immediate origin and destination of the flows, not the ultimate ones (see below recent efforts to remedy this); (2) show sums directly sent by parents to their subsidiaries, not those borrowed locally; (3) measure financial flows, not the economic value created with them. Additionally, most published figures of FDI inflows and outflows are on a net basis, which makes interpretation difficult, and FDI stocks are reported using a variety of methodologies, thus hampering their comparability. Let us now look at each of these points.
Until 2014, all FDI flows and stocks were recorded on the basis of their immediate origin and destination. Recently the OECD has started to push countries to publish data on both the immediate and ultimate owners of FDI flows and stocks coming into their country. So far, however, only 19 developed countries have collected such data, and some of it has not been made public. The extensive past and current use of FDI flows and stocks measured on the basis of the immediate investor poses a number of problems. First, it often leads to misclassifying the owner of the investment. For example, when in 1998 General Motors set up an auto assembly plant in Poland, the National Bank of Poland classified it in its FDI statistics as a German investment into Poland because the immediate investor was Opel, General Motors’ wholly-owned German subsidiary, even though the ultimate one was its US parent, General Motors. Likewise Deutsche Telekom invested in Macedonia through its majority-owned subsidiary Magyar Telekom so the investment was registered as a Hungarian one into Macedonia (Kalotay, 2012 ). Such “indirect investments” have been estimated to make up around 30% of global FDI flows (Aykut, Sanghi & Kosmidou, 2017 ). In the cases shown above, the ultimate owner is relatively easy to uncover, but this is not always the case. UNCTAD ( 2016 ) notes that the 100 MNEs with the highest transnationality index have on average seven hierarchical levels in their ownership structure and more than 500 subsidiaries each, located in more than 50 countries, and almost 70 of them are in offshore financial centers (OFCs) – countries that offer some or all of the following: low or zero taxation, moderate or light financial regulation, and banking secrecy or anonymity (Aykut et al., 2017 ). Many manufacturing subsidiaries are owned by special-purpose entities (SPEs) located in OFCs, which themselves are owned by other SPEs (SPEs are foreign subsidiaries established to pursue specific and temporary objectives such as the financing of other foreign subsidiaries and that have few or no local employees) (OECD, 2000 ). 2 This can pose problems when using subsidiary counts to, for example, calculate the extent of a firm’s multinationality, as we discuss below in the section on firm-level data. For BRIC countries the number of indirect investments dwarfs that of direct ones, with between 50 and 80% of their outward FDI flows channeled through SPEs located in OFCs (Sauvant, 2017 ). In 2008, 60% of the outward FDI flows of Brazil went to SPEs based in six countries, four Caribbean OFCs – the British Virgin Islands (BVI), the Cayman Islands, the Bahamas, and the Netherlands Antilles – as well as the Netherlands and Luxembourg, while in 2014 70% of Russia’s inward and outward FDI flows originated from, and went to, OFCs based in Cyprus, the Netherlands, the BVI, Bermuda, Luxembourg, the Bahamas, and Switzerland (Aykut et al., 2017 ). Part of the flows going to OFCs may return to the investing country, a phenomenon called round-tripping, while the rest may be forwarded to other host countries, what Sutherland and Anderson ( 2015 ) call “onward-journey FDI” and the OECD “capital in transit”. Round tripping is a widespread phenomenon, undertaken by firms of every country, but especially prevalent in the case of China, Russia, Canada, and Indonesia, for which it accounts for more than 15% of inward FDI (Damgaard, Elkjaer & Johannessen, 2019 ). Round-tripping is undertaken to minimize tax, to hide the identity of the ultimate owners, and to reduce home-country political risk and capital controls (Borga & Caliandro, 2018 ; Karhunen, Ledyaeva, & Brouthers, 2021 ). It results in over-estimating the amount of investment, since funds sent from a country to an OFC and then round-tripped back to that country are counted twice, leading to volume biases.
Taking into account the sums that transit through OFCs can have a dramatic impact on the amount and geographic distribution of FDI flows and stocks. In 2013, for example, 70% of Chinese FDI outflows went to OFCs – Hong Kong, the BVI, and the Cayman Islands – with Hong Kong receiving 60% of these flows. Figures for 2016 are 71.4%, with 58.2% going to Hong Kong (Sutherland, Hennart & Anderson, 2019 , Table 2). Based on Xiao’s ( 2004 ) research, Casanova, Garcia-Herrera and Xia ( 2015 ) estimate that only 30% of the sums recorded as being sent to Hong Kong actually remained there, while 40% went back to China (round-tripping), and 30% were forwarded to other countries (onward-journey FDI). They assume that the final geographical destination of onward-journey flows was proportional to those directly sent from China. They also redistribute the sums sent to the BVI based on the share of direct flows received by each country (with Hong Kong excluded), while the sums sent to the Cayman Islands are redistributed to North America, Latin America, and Europe using the same formula. The results of this exercise are dramatic. The stock of Chinese investment abroad falls by 25% (from US $660 billion to $498 billion), while that in North America and Europe doubles. Recent estimates by the OECD that report both immediate and ultimate investors highlight the full extent of the problems caused by using FDI flow and stock data based on immediate rather than ultimate destinations: taking into account onward-journey Chinese investment flows increased the 2015 Chinese stock of FDI in Hungary by a factor of eight, in Italy by a factor of six, and in France by a factor of three (Sutherland et al., 2019 , Table 3).
As well as having huge impacts on the measured amount and geographic distribution of MNE activity, leading to volume and geographical biases, conventional FDI reporting results in industrial composition biases (i.e., biases towards services) because most SPEs are registered as providing business services. FDI statistics show that in 2012 only 6% of Chinese outward FDI stock was in manufacturing, while 33% was in business services (Zhou & Leung, 2015 ). These figures clearly understate the share of Chinese overseas activity in manufacturing and overstate that in services, since in China manufacturing was that year the recipient of 27% of private domestic loans while that going to business services was negligible. SPEs are the cause of a similar bias towards services in US FDI statistics. Because their MNE parents describe the activity of the large number of SPEs they own as services, US data show manufacturing accounting for only 21% of the US stock of outward FDI when reported by the industry of the subsidiary, but 59% when reported by that of the parent (Whichard, 2008 ). In short, the omission of round-tripping and onward-journey FDI flows in published FDI statistics leads to very serious inaccuracies.
The existence of volume, geographical, and industrial composition biases in FDI data owing to onward-journey capital flows has been known for at least three decades (Cantwell, 1992 ). Strangely, they have not been properly acknowledged or dealt with – most likely because of the considerable challenge of doing so. Buckley et al., ( 2007 ), for example, the most cited study of Chinese outward foreign direct investment and the 2017 winner of a Journal of International Business Studies Decade Award, study the geographical distribution of annual outflows of Chinese FDI to 49 countries, including Hong Kong (but excluding the BVI and the Cayman Islands). They do not address the fact that part of the funds going to Hong Kong and sent onwards to the other countries in their sample are not counted since these flows are not registered as coming out of China, but out of Hong Kong. The omission of these onward-journey flows from Hong Kong is likely to have seriously distorted their results (as is the omission of onward-journey flows from the Cayman Islands and BVI). To their credit, in their retrospective on the decade award prize, they acknowledge some of these data issues (Buckley et al., 2017 ). Sutherland et al. ( 2019 ) documents similar problems in other articles on Chinese FDI published in the Journal of International Business Studies over the past decade, further highlighting the scale and nature of these measurement problems. 3
A second problem with FDI flows is that they only measure funds coming from a parent to its subsidiary, not the total amount of investment made by the subsidiary in the host country. Yet, we know that a significant share of the financing of foreign subsidiaries is obtained from local sources. Lehman, Sayek and Kang ( 2004 ) found that in 1999 US majority-owned foreign subsidiaries (MOFAs) obtained 29.4% of their financing from such sources. One would expect the MNE preference for local financing to be greater the more competitive local financial markets, and it is therefore not surprising that the authors find the proportion of funds sourced locally to be higher in economically developed countries (39.6%) than in developing ones (30%). Taking advantage of the fact that the US publishes data on both the sales and value added of US subsidiaries (of MOFAs for value added) in a given host country, as well as on the stock of inward US FDI in that country, Beugelsdijk, Hennart, Slangen and Smeets ( 2010 ) look at the factors that affect the difference between the value of inward FDI and the value added and sales of all subsidiaries of a given country in a host country. They find that the underestimation by FDI stocks of subsidiary sales and value added is greater in countries with more developed financial markets, presumably because MNEs use more local financing in those countries.
A third limitation of FDI data lies in their recording only financial resources, yet the economic activity generated by a subsidiary also depends on the contribution of its employees, with labor productivity affected by the industry of the subsidiary and by country-specific factors. Everything else constant, the higher a host country’s labor productivity, the greater the extent to which inward FDI stocks will underestimate subsidiary activity. Since we would expect the use of local financing and labor’s contribution to sales and value added to be greater in more economically developed countries, the underestimation of economic activity by FDI stocks is therefore also likely to be greater in those countries than in less economically developed ones. This implies that using FDI stocks as a proxy for the amount of aggregate subsidiary activity introduces a systematic bias if that amount is correlated with the study’s dependent variable. Habib and Zurawiki ( 2002 ), for example, attempt to determine if a country’s level of corruption deters inward investment by foreign MNEs. They proxy that investment by FDI inflows. Because of the greater possibility of borrowing locally to finance the subsidiary, FDI inflows will cover a smaller part of the total investment made by a foreign subsidiary when that investment is made in a more economically developed country than when made in a developing country. Consequently, the FDI figures they use in their regressions systematically underestimate the real value of the investment made by subsidiaries located in more developed countries. Because a country’s level of corruption is likely to be inversely correlated with its level of economic development, the results of studies that use FDI inflows to look at the relationship between a country’s level of corruption and its ability to attract foreign economic activity will be biased as the measured level of inward foreign investment in developed countries will be systematically lower than the actual one. Habib and Zurawiki’s findings may then be an underestimate of the negative relationship between a country’s extent of corruption and the level of foreign economic activity it attracts.
The use of FDI flows and stocks has still further limitations. FDI inward and outward flows are the sum of net equity flows from MNE parents to their subsidiaries, the reinvested earnings of those subsidiaries, and net intracompany loans between parents and subsidiaries. Both inward and outward flows can be negative, for example when loan repayments by the subsidiaries of MNEs located in the country offset new equity coming into the country. While data on these three components of inward and outward flows are published separately by the OECD and the IMF, most researchers have used aggregate figures calculated on a net basis. 4 Yet without looking at the disaggregated figures one is unable to tell whether an outward flow of zero corresponds to the case of no investment flow or to that of outflows matching inflows. Kerner ( 2014 ) provides an interesting example. In 2010, US FDI outflows to Moldova were close to zero. That year, US MOFAs had only US $2 million in fixed capital and about 100 employees in that country. That same year, FDI flows to Poland were also approximately zero. Between 2004 and 2005, however, the 193 non-bank US MOFAs in Poland added 13,000 employees and produced $679 million in added value. The zero FDI inflows figure for Poland was due to the fact that equity outflows (minus US $30 million) and intercompany debt outflows (minus US $163 million) netted out reinvested earnings (plus US $194 million) but one would not have been able to know that when using aggregated figures – those published by UNCTAD, for example. Instead, one might have concluded that US MNEs made no new investments in Poland. The fact that both inflows and outflows are calculated on a net basis causes problems for studies that use aggregate FDI flows as a proxy for the economic activity of MNE subsidiaries in a country. Bruno et al. ( 2021 ), for example, investigate how much additional incoming direct investment a country receives if it joins a custom union such as the European Union. They measure new investment using UNCTAD data on aggregated FDI inflows, that is the sum of equity flows, reinvested earnings, and intercompany debt. When faced with negative values for these flows, the authors treat them as zero (Bruno et al., 2021 , footnote 7). This is problematic as a negative net value, caused for example by the repayment of intracompany loans by subsidiaries already in the country, may mask positive new investment into the country by new and/or incumbent firms.
The measurement of FDI stocks is also tricky. They should be estimated at market value, but often are at historical cost, or are obtained by cumulating flows. Databases of FDI stocks include estimates obtained from all three methods, making cross-country comparisons hazardous (UNCTAD, 2013 ). 5 The United States provides FDI stock data on both an historical and a market value basis, so we can get an idea of the size of the gap between these two estimation methods. On a market value basis, foreign FDI stock in the US in 2016, US $6.6 trillion, was almost double that on a historical cost basis, US $3.7 trillion (Sauvant, 2017 ).
All this said, it is easy to understand the attractiveness of FDI data. FDI datasets can be downloaded for free from public databases and purport to measure the sum of the activities of all subsidiaries of a given country into a host country; they cover many countries and are available for long periods – Mariotti and Marzano’s ( 2021 ) UNCTAD dataset covers 63 countries over 37 years. The potential alternatives pale in comparison. Recent attempts have been made to obtain better estimates of the final ultimate destinations and origins of FDI flows by stripping out onward journey flows from aggregate FDI figures (Damgaard et al., 2019 ; Borga & Callandro, 2018 ). These estimates, however, are obtained by marrying firm-level data (from Orbis) with newly published OECD data that report FDI by immediate and ultimate destination and by instrument (i.e., SPE or not), and require making fairly strong assumptions. Moreover, they only attempt to account for the problem of onward-journey flows, and do not address the other issues we have mentioned. Ideally, one would like to use data such as the value added generated by all subsidiaries of foreign MNEs in a given host country, or their sales, or even their employment. With some exceptions such as the United States, countries do not collect, or do not make public, such figures for inward subsidiary activity, or for the outward economic activity of the subsidiaries of their own MNEs. Some of the most comprehensive firm-level databases, such as Toyo Keizai ( 2022 ) which covers the foreign subsidiaries of Japanese MNEs, do not provide systematic data on subsidiary sales. Collecting such data from national firm-level databases requires a significant effort. In fact, as we see in the next section, some of the same problems present in country-level FDI data also afflict firm-level data.
Table 1 summarizes the problems identified in this section and makes some suggestions on how to alleviate some of them. Geographical and volume biases due to the classification of FDI flows based on immediate origin and destination can be partially remedied using databases that classify flows based on ultimate source (i.e., Germany rather than Hungary in our Deutsche Telekom example) and destination. Such data has been published by the OECD for 19 countries ( https://stats.oecd.org ). Damgaard et al. ( 2019 ) have made available at https://nielsjohnnessen.net/FDIdatabase their estimates for the countries not covered by the OECD database. Industrial composition biases can be minimized by classifying foreign subsidiaries by the industry of the parent rather than by that of the subsidiary. The best measures of the economic activity of foreign subsidiaries in a host country are its value added, followed by its sales, and then its employment. These measures avoid the biases caused by local financing, but are unfortunately only available for a few countries. The OECD and IMF (but not UNCTAD) break down FDI flows into their three components, net equity flows, reinvested earnings, and intracompany loans. Lastly, one can obtain very rough estimates of FDI stock at market value for countries that only provide values at historical cost by looking at the relationship between the two in countries that report both.
Measuring MNE activity at the firm level
IB scholars are increasingly using secondary data taken from firm-level datasets. These datasets are of many types. Some are produced from surveys undertaken by national statistical offices. The most complete are the censuses and surveys of foreign direct investment abroad and foreign investment in the United States produced by the US Department of Commerce. One drawback of such data is that firm-level information has to remain confidential, so statistical analyses at the firm level can only be made using the agency’s computers at its premises.
Scholars can also use country-specific commercial databases, for example CSMAR (China), Prowess (India), NEEDS (Japan), and Compustat (United States). These databases provide balance-sheet items for all firms based in one country. Their coverage of a firm’s foreign activities is uneven. Compustat, for example, publishes data on foreign sales extracted from firm 10K reports to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). However, the SEC lets firms define how they want to report their geographic segments, so firms vary on how they define them. Compustat only reports four geographic segments, including the home market, so it is difficult to make detailed comparisons of geographic reach across firms (Wieserma & Bowen, 2011 ). The national focus of these databases makes it also difficult to make international comparisons.
IB scholars can also tap global commercial databases of foreign entries, be it greenfield investments (Financial Times fDi Markets) or mergers and acquisitions (Thompson Financial Security Data Corporation; Bureau van Dijk Zephyr). However, these databases usually lack detailed firm-level data, and thus matching is often required. Orbis, a commercial database that provides a variety of financial information on parents (assets, sales, profitability) as well as on their subsidiaries and ownership chains (immediate and ultimate owners) for more than 300 million firms worldwide, has proved to be particularly attractive to IB researchers – a search of leading IB journals returns 120 recent articles using data drawn from that database. Orbis makes it possible to obtain large samples of foreign subsidiaries from different parts of the world. However, some of the problems identified in the previous section on country-level data arise also when dealing with firm-level data such as those provided by Orbis. Specifically, the presence of SPEs, and the difficulty of separating them from bona fide subsidiaries (i.e., subsidiaries engaged in value-adding economic activity), is likely to cause problems. Those problems manifest themselves in various ways, from how to identify MNEs to how to measure the extent and speed of their foreign expansion. Below we provide a few examples.
Estrin, Meyer and Pelletier ( 2018 ) use Orbis to compare the pattern of foreign countries entered by developed economy MNEs with that of their emerging market counterparts. They count the number of subsidiaries the MNEs in the two groups have established in target countries. In doing so, they do not seem to have distinguished between bona fide subsidiaries and SPEs, as indicated by their Table 2 which shows in which of 30 developed countries the emerging market MNEs in their sample located their subsidiaries. That table indicates that almost 40% of the subsidiaries of Brazilian MNEs were in the Netherlands, a surprising number given the relatively small economic size of that country. A hint of what is really going on is given by recent OECD data which breaks FDI stock down by “instrument” (i.e., whether it was in SPEs or bona fide subsidiaries), and which shows that 65% of the US $4.37 trillion FDI stock in the Netherlands was SPE-related. 8 This opens the possibility that many of the Brazilian subsidiaries in the Netherlands listed in Orbis might be SPEs. We looked in Orbis at the 173 Brazilian subsidiaries in the Netherlands in 2020 and found that 62 of them, or 35.8%, were investment holding companies (NACE code 6420) – the most common type of SPE – with very few employees or none at all. In Luxembourg, which Meyer and Pelletier’s Table 2 shows was host to 2.3% of all Brazilian subsidiaries, almost half of them were SPEs. SPEs, on the other hand, made up only 2.5% of all Brazilian subsidiaries in the UK and 6.1% of those in Germany. Given the large number of SPEs and their uneven distribution across host countries, not distinguishing them from bona fide subsidiaries is likely to affect the result of studies which, like Estrin et al., proxy the level of foreign investment by the number of subsidiaries. 9 We would expect the presence of SPEs to also contaminate the results of studies that rely on subsidiary counts to analyze the distribution of foreign investment over time and across industries.
One way to define an MNE is as a firm that owns at least one fully-controlled foreign subsidiary (Bruno et al., 2021 ; De Jong & van Houten, 2014 ). A significant number of MNEs, however, are only multinational by virtue of having SPE subsidiaries. This is quite common in the case of Chinese firms because of the use of such SPEs for round-tripping. Counting SPEs as bona fide subsidiaries will result in the inclusion of purely domestic firms in MNE samples (Sutherland et al., 2019 ).
Some authors have also measured a firm’s degree of internationalization by the number of its foreign subsidiaries, or the ratio of the number of foreign subsidiaries over all subsidiaries. Liang, Ren and Sun ( 2015 ) construct a degree of globalization index for Chinese MNEs as the average of their foreign sales to total sales, foreign assets to total assets, and number of foreign branches and subsidiaries over total number of branches and subsidiaries. One difficulty with this measure is the large number of SPEs among the foreign subsidiaries of Chinese firms. As of November 2021, there were 138,118 subsidiaries incorporated outside of China that had a Chinese ultimate owner. Of these, 10,653, or 7.7% of the total, are likely to be SPEs. 10 Hence, any major differences between firms in their use of SPEs is likely to bias the results. The same issue arises in, for example, Yang, Martins and Driffield ( 2013 ).
A common way to measure a firm’s internationalization breadth has also been to count the number of countries in which it has subsidiaries (e.g., Lu & Beamish, 2004 ; Tallman & Li, 1996 ; Zahra, 2003 ). The presence of SPEs, however, makes this an imperfect measure. This is because in some countries the only subsidiaries a firm has are SPEs. Orbis shows that China’s Fosun International, for example, had subsidiaries in 12 different countries. In four of these, however, i.e., Hong Kong, the Cayman Islands, Luxembourg and the US, the firm had no bona fide subsidiaries, its subsidiaries there being labeled as “investment holding companies” or being active in “business and other management consultancy activities”, “advertising” (in the Cayman Islands) and performing “other financial service activities” (in Hong Kong). Counting foreign subsidiaries that are most likely SPEs as bona fide ones will thus lead to an overestimation of the true breadth of an MNE’s internationalization. 11
The presence of SPEs is also likely to affect the results of studies that rely on subsidiary count to measure internationalization speed. This is the case with Kim, Wu, Schuler and Hoskisson ( 2020 ) who use data from 767 publicly listed Chinese MNEs to look at how speed of intra-regional internationalization versus inter-regional internationalization affects performance, with speed measured by the number of new subsidiaries created per year. They counted all foreign subsidiaries, “irrespective of where they were located” (Kim et al., 2020 : 1086). Yet not all subsidiaries are created equal: we have seen that many of those established by Chinese MNEs in Hong Kong, Singapore, the Cayman Islands, and the BVI are SPEs (Anderson & Sutherland, 2015 ), but this is also increasingly the case with those in the Netherlands and Luxembourg. The presence of SPEs thus contaminate measures of internationalization speed based on subsidiary counts because adding an SPE can be done at the stroke of a pen, considerably faster than setting up or acquiring a manufacturing plant.
Lastly, studies using secondary firm-level databases to compare MNEs originating from different countries assign country of origin, for example whether the MNE is based in a developed or emerging market, by identifying their global ultimate owner (Estrin et al., 2018 ; Jindra, Hassan, & Cantner, 2016 ; Jones & Temouri, 2016 ). This is problematic, however, as some MNEs may establish their legal domicile in a country that is not the one where they conduct most of their business, a phenomenon called corporate inversion (Whichard, 2008 ). Inversions became a hot political issue in the US when some US firms acquired foreign firms in low-tax countries (such as Ireland) and had the acquisition acquire the parents back so as to shift their legal domicile to the lower-tax country. They are, however, even more common outside the US. Chinese MNEs, for example, owing to the practice of round-tripping, have long been comfortable with inverting to OFCs such as the Cayman Islands (De Jong, Greeven, & Ebbers, 2017 ). The number of inverted Chinese MNEs is quite large: using Orbis, we identified 1087 MNEs (i.e., defined as owning at least one foreign subsidiary) with ultimate owners (using a 50% plus ownership stake) based in the Cayman Islands that were majority owner of at least one subsidiary in China. The business of these firms (which include major firms such as Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Tencent Holdings, Kingsoft Corporation Limited, Mengniu Dairy, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation, China Special Steel Wire Rod Group Ltd, Dynasty Fine Wines Group Ltd, and China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd.) was primarily in China so, for all intent and purposes, they are Chinese firms (though some may have bona fide , i.e., non-SPE, foreign subsidiaries). Scholars generating samples of MNEs from a given country based on ultimate ownership criteria, an approach most often employed by empirical studies using the Orbis database, need therefore to be mindful not to exclude inverted firms, which are sometimes a significant percentage of MNEs from that country. 12 While the full extent of inversions and their impact on studies using Orbis is unknown, Sigler, Martinus, Iacopini and Derudder ( 2020 ) found that 3% of MNEs they sampled using Orbis had been inverted. Their sample, however, did not include many emerging market countries, like China, in which the share of inverted firms is likely to be far higher.
As mentioned above, nearly one-third of global FDI transits through OFCs, well-known tax havens such as the BVI and the Cayman Islands, but also countries such as the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Ireland (Haberly & Wójcik, 2015 ). Authors of studies that identify foreign subsidiaries using firm-level databases need therefore to be very careful when building their samples. Yet very few studies explicitly attempt to exclude all SPEs. We suspect that this is not solely because it is difficult and time-consuming to do so, but also because there is a general lack of awareness of how pervasive SPEs are within MNE ownership and control chains. 13 To compound the problem, recent research (Borga & Callandro, 2018 ) shows that MNEs are increasingly transiting capital not only through SPEs but also through various kinds of other less obvious foreign subsidiaries – vastly complicating the process of tracking genuine MNE investments. Excluding SPEs may therefore not be sufficient to eliminate all onward-journey subsidiaries.
Table 2 summarizes some of the problems discussed here and possible remedies. SPEs should be removed when assessing whether a firm is an MNE, when calculating the overall level of economic activity by firms of country A in country B, and when counting the number of foreign countries in which a firm operates and the speed at which it creates new subsidiaries. One solution might be to eliminate all subsidiaries domiciled in known OFCs, such as the Cayman Islands, the BVI, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. The problem is that some OFCs, like the last two countries mentioned, are also home to bona fide subsidiaries. A better way is to look at the industrial classification of the subsidiary given by Orbis and at their employee count. Subsidiaries with NACE code 6420 (investment holding companies) are likely to be SPEs. However, in some subsidiaries NACE 6420 is only listed as a secondary code, while the primary code might be something else, like “transmission of other information service activities” (NACE 6399) or “other information technology and computer service activities” (NACE 6209), for example. This again complicates the challenge of identifying SPEs. Whenever Orbis provides subsidiary employment data, SPEs can be identified as those having no or very few employees. The omission of inverted firms from country samples can be avoided by looking at a country’s most common inversion destination, for example Hong Kong, the Cayman Islands, and the BVI in the Chinese case, and then adding to the sample inverted firms registered there.
As we said at the outset, availability and reliability of data are a major challenge for IB researchers. A look at how IB scholars measure the foreign activities of a central actor in the field, the MNE, shows the extent of the challenge. We could have given other examples. 14 Our point is that IB scholars face additional data challenges compared to researchers in fields that study purely national phenomena, as the latter can rely on extensive domestic databases that provide the data they need. Theory poses a second challenge for those conducting IB research. Just as we have concentrated on one issue, the measurement of MNE activity using country-level and firm-level data, to illustrate data challenges, we focus on one theory, transaction cost theory, to highlight theory challenges.
It is generally agreed that concepts and theories are developed within the context of a particular culture. As Hofstede ( 1993 : 82) puts it, “management scientists, theorists, and writers are human too: they grew up in a particular society in a particular period, and their ideas cannot help but reflect the constraints of their environment”. Problems arise when theorists and their followers claim universal applicability for their theories when in fact there is not. Uncovering the hidden culturally-based assumptions behind many of our existing theories so as to correctly apply them to different contexts is a major challenge facing the IB field, one not faced by scholars who apply domestically developed theories to domestic issues.
There is overwhelming evidence that the field of management, including IB, is dominated by scholars from the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia, i.e., Anglo-Saxon countries. Between 1971 and 2015, three-quarters of the articles on IB topics in 14 top-rated journals (the three top-rated IB journals plus 11 top disciplinary journals) were written by scholars based in the USA, the UK, Canada, and Australia (Aïssaoui, Geringer & Livanis, 2020 ). 15 Harzing and Metz ( 2013 ) looked at the geographical location of the editors and editorial board members of 57 journals in five areas of management (operations management, international business, general management and strategy, human resource management/organizational behavior/industrial relations, and marketing) at 5-year intervals between 1989 and 2009. In 2009, 52 journal editors out of 57 were based in an Anglo-Saxon country (38 in the United States alone). The proportion of editorial board members based in those countries was 84.5% in 1989 and, in 2009, two decades later, still high at 77% (see also Meyer, 2006 ). While some of these scholars were born in non-Anglo-Saxon countries, many obtained their doctorates from Anglo-Saxon universities, and one can surmise that they have been influenced by their Anglo-Saxon training. 16 Note also that the percentage of Anglo-Saxons on the board of professional journals constitutes a lower bound on the influence of Anglo-Saxon ideas and beliefs in management – and on the IB field – given that many researchers outside the US and UK have been trained in Anglo-Saxon countries and that many European and Asian universities host visiting scholars from the US and the UK and encourage their faculty to co-author with them (Aïssaoui et al., 2020 ; Shenkar, 2004 ).
Boyacigiller and Adler ( 1988 ) note, citing Triandis ( 1972 ), that identifying the impact of culture on the development of theories is difficult, but they convincingly show that American cultural values have influenced the particular ways some US scholars have thought about organizational commitment, individual motivation, and leadership. 17 Hofstede found that Anglo-Saxon countries scored high on individualism – 91 for the US, 90 for Australia, 89 for the UK, and 80 for Canada, vs. 20 for China and 48 for India. 18 He describes individualism as “the degree to which people in a country prefer to act as individuals rather than as members of groups” (Hofstede, 1993 : 89). One would expect scholars living in countries that rank high in individualism to emphasize the free will of actors while downplaying the influence of the social group to which they belong.
One would therefore expect Anglo-Saxon authors to over-emphasize individual action and to under-emphasize social processes. 18 We think it is possible to discern these biases in one of the dominant theories in IB, transaction cost theory (TCT). In the following paragraphs we give a few examples of this by looking at the way TCT has been used by IB scholars, and show that these cultural biases can be remedied without damaging the theory’s core. Indeed, by explicitly identifying these biases, scholars can arrive at a richer and more comprehensive version of TCT which, as we will show, retains strong predictive power in contexts that are significantly different from the Anglo-Saxon one in which it was principally developed.
Individualistic cultures stress the ability of individuals to unilaterally control their environment. Triandis ( 1993 : 158) notes that “The most important facet of collectivism is an interdependent self… the most important facet of individualism is an independent self.” It is therefore not surprising that early applications of TCT to the foreign entry mode choice (Anderson & Gatignon, 1986 ) assumed that, when it came to entering a foreign market, the MNE was always in the catbird seat and could, unless constrained by host governments, unilaterally choose whatever entry mode it wanted. In the words of Padmanabhan and Cho ( 1996 : 47), the entry mode choice for an MNE “involves tradeoffs related to the [MNE’s] level of resource commitment, the degree of control, the specification and assumption of risks and returns, and the degree of global rationalization.” Researchers with a less individualistic outlook have realized, however, that entry into a foreign country is a cooperative endeavor because the MNE almost always requires complementary inputs to exploit its intangibles there. These complementary inputs – labor, utilities, land, logistics, and access to local customers – are typically controlled by local parties, firms, and individuals. Ignoring these local suppliers of complementary inputs limits the explanatory power of the theory. First, it erroneously suggests that the entry mode decision is unilaterally taken by the foreign investor. In reality, MNEs have the liberty to choose between a wholly-owned subsidiary and a joint venture only when complementary inputs can be obtained on efficient markets. When they cannot, the only efficient way to access such inputs is to enlist the cooperation of their owners by offering them a share of the profits of the venture. In other words, MNEs do not always joint venture because they want to, as suggested by Anderson and Gatignon, but often because they have to. Understanding that MNEs need the cooperation of owners of local factors of production makes it possible to analyze how the transactional characteristics of these factors combine with those of the intangibles contributed by the MNE to determine the optimal entry mode (Hennart, 2009 ). Taking into account local owners of complementary inputs also explains why some local firms have been able to leverage control of these inputs to offset their initial technological handicap and successfully compete with large foreign MNEs in their home market (Hennart, 2012 ).
The Williamsonian version of TCT can also be criticized for its over-emphasis on the determinants of market efficiency relative to those of firm efficiency. This focus on markets is not surprising, given that, as Triandis ( 1993 : 160) notes, “the prototypical individualistic social relationship is the market.” The core argument of TCT is generally presented as follows: the chosen governance structure (market, hierarchy, or hybrid) is the one that is aligned with the attributes of the transaction, which are asset specificity, uncertainty, and frequency (Cuypers, Hennart, Silverman, & Ertug, 2021 ; David & Han, 2004 ). When these are high, markets will fail, and this failure will lead to hierarchical governance (i.e., firms) being selected. Hence the prediction that firms will be the chosen governance structure is based on the extent of market efficiency. However, there are no reasons why market failure should guarantee firm success. A governance structure (market or firm) is chosen if the benefits that arise from the organization of interdependences are higher than the costs of doing so. In some circumstances, these costs may be higher than the benefits for both markets and firms. Consequently, market failure is not a sufficient condition for the existence of firms. Consider the following example used by Hennart ( 1982 ). In the first 80 years of the 19th century, UK firms had a technological lead over their continental European and American rivals that can only be compared to that enjoyed by US firms after the Second World War. But while the US technological lead was exploited through the establishment of foreign subsidiaries by US MNEs, that did not happen in the UK case until the very end of the period (Jones, 1996 , 2000 ). Instead, UK technological advances were transferred overseas through other means: the sale of products, the smuggling of machinery, the hiring of skilled UK workers by foreign firms, and the emigration of UK entrepreneurs. The absence of UK MNEs cannot be explained by the superiority of the market processes used to transfer knowledge at that time since the licensing market was even more imperfect then than later in the 20th century when US technology was exploited abroad by US MNEs. The simplified version of TCT under which the choice of organizational form depends on market failure, itself a function of the levels of asset specificity, uncertainty, and frequency, is therefore only half of a comprehensive theory of governance choice. A full theory simultaneously considers the factors that affect the efficiency of markets and those that affect the efficiency of firms, and assess for each transaction their absolute and relative efficiency. Williamson was aware of that when he wrote that “one of the tasks of transaction cost economics is to assess purported bureaucratic failures in comparative institutional terms” (Williamson, 1993b :119) and indeed he addresses the issue in both his 1975 (Williamson, 1975 ) and 1985 books (Williamson, 1985 ). But he does not systematically develop the variables driving these hierarchical failures as he does those responsible for market failures.
TCT allows us to do that. TCT scholars recognize that to yield benefits interdependencies must be organized: parties must be apprised of the potential benefits of organizing the interdependence, and a way must be found to avoid excessive bargaining over the distribution of the potential gains and to make sure that promises are kept. This incurs costs because of the existence of two basic human characteristics – bounded rationality and opportunism. These two characteristics imply that it is costly to efficiently inform parties of what needs to be done and to reward them for their contribution. Hennart ( 1982 , 1993 ) has argued that there are two generic ways to perform these two tasks: one can decentralize information gathering and provide output-based incentives, i.e., use the price system, or one can centralize information and control behavior, i.e., use hierarchy. While all institutions use a mix of these two generic methods of organization, firms mostly use hierarchy. In firms, bosses centralize information and direct worker behavior. Output is generated through the control of behavior, either directly through real time direct observation or indirectly through bureaucratic control techniques, such as accounting. While we lack space here to go into details, one can show that the techniques available for directing employees and monitoring their behavior were just too crude in the 19th century to support the profitable operations of UK MNEs. Consequently, knowledge was transferred through other ways. By the 20th century, management techniques had improved sufficiently to make knowledge exploitation through MNEs possible, even though the market for knowledge had improved in the meantime (Hennart, 1982 ).
Williamson has used the term “high-powered incentives” to describe those used in markets, and “low-powered incentives” to describe those used in firms (see for example Williamson, 1985 : 140). This wording can be interpreted as suggesting that firms cannot use the strong incentives used in markets, and are thus at some inherent disadvantage. That Williamson sees markets as providing unique (and superior) incentives is reinforced by his writing a few pages later that “the market is a marvel… because of its remarkable capacity to present and preserve high-powered incentives” (Williamson, 1985 : 161). Such a stance neglects the fact that while the price system provides incentives to market actors to exert effort and show initiative by rewarding them based on their output, i.e., it offers output-based incentives, firms reward employees based on their behavior. Employees who do not follow managerial guidelines will be sanctioned, and there is no reason to expect that being docked one day of pay will be less effective in influencing their behavior than losing one day’s revenues will be to self-employed individuals. Williamson’s ( 1985 : 140) argument that “firms cannot mimic the high-powered incentives of markets without experiencing added costs” seems to overlook the fact that firms do not need to use output-based high-powered incentives because they can exert high-powered constraints on behavior. Providing high-powered output incentives stimulates high output, but often also the generation of negative externalities. For instance, the literature has shown that franchisees, who are subject to output-based high-powered incentives because they get to keep all of the income they produce minus the franchise fee, are tempted to reduce quality to maximize their income (Brickley & Dark, 1987 ). Trademark owners for whom consistent quality is important may prefer to use the high-powered behavior incentives provided by employment contracts and have their own employees run the outlets. Michael ( 2000 ), for example, shows that product quality in chains that run their outlets with employees is higher than in those that do it with franchisees.
Williamson’s distinction between personal interactions and business transactions, and his under-emphasis of the role social constraints can play in enforcing the latter, seems also to reflect the relatively greater focus that US culture puts on individuals than on the social context in which they operate. In an article where he discusses the notion of trust, Williamson argues that the word trust should be reserved for non-calculative relationships that are characterized by “(1) the absence of monitoring, (2) favorable or forgiving predilections, and (3) discreteness” (Williamson, 1993a : 484). For him, such trust “is warranted only for very special personal relations that would be seriously degraded if a calculative orientation were permitted. Commercial relations do not qualify” (ibid, 486). This suggests a strict separation between business transactions and personal relations, where the former are strictly calculative while the latter are not. This separation is not universal. In many – perhaps most – parts of the world, business is done with persons with whom one has close relationships, so trust, in the Williamsonian sense, is a feature of both personal and business relationships. 20 Why is this the case? Because, consistent with the TCT idea that governance needs to be aligned with the characteristics of transactions, and that these characteristics are influenced by the institutional environment, the absence of formal market-supporting institutions such as courts increases the attractiveness of doing business with family and close friends over that of dealing with outsiders. This in turn has important theoretical and practical implications for foreign market entry, as it explains the considerable advantage held by incumbents over new entrants in countries characterized by underdeveloped formal market institutions.
TCT scholars see the choice of governance as being influenced by the institutional environment which defines the rules of the games, i.e., property rights, contract laws, norms, customs, and the like (Williamson, 1993b , 2000 ). They have been interested in working out the mechanisms by which different rules of the game yield different types of optimal governance. With few exceptions (Williamson, 1991 ), Williamson’s research has mostly focused on market transactions and their enforcement in the US context. Some of these transactions are self-enforcing because of low asset specificity, while others require safeguards which usually take the form of contracts. Contracts are formal, usually written, legal documents by which parties enter into mutual obligations enforceable by courts or arbitrators based on a set of laws. Specifying ex ante these mutual obligations reduces the chance of ex post opportunism, which is especially useful to parties who have to make investments which are specific to their partners. Williamson has focused on the limits of such contracts (leading to vertical integration) and on the ways to make them more efficient, for example by making credible commitments (Williamson, 1985 , chapters 5, 7 and 8). 21 In this environment, found in the United States and in a few other – primarily Anglo-Saxon – countries, individuals contract with a wide range of partners, some known and some unknown, with dispute settlement handled by third parties, generally courts and arbitrators, a system that has been called “rule-based” governance. In many other countries, transactions are embedded in relationships, and their enforcement is effected through bilateral or multilateral social constraints – a system of relation-based governance (Li, 2003 ; Li, Park & Li, 2004 ). In China, for example, business transactions are conducted through guanxi, which Standiford and Marshall ( 2000 : 21), quoting Yang ( 1994 ), describe as “cultivating personal relationships through the exchange of favors and gifts for the purpose of obtaining goods and services, developing networks of mutual dependence, and creating a sense of obligation and indebtedness.” Guanxi has equivalents in many other countries, for example wa in Japan, inmaek in Korea, blat in Russia, and wasta in Arab countries (Michailova & Worm, 2003 ; Velez-Calle, Robeldo-Arialla & Rodriguez-Rios, 2015 ). In the countries listed above, and in many others, contracts and courts play a very limited role, an institutional environment very different from the one on which Williamson has mostly focused.
There is a temptation to ignore such differences, and to blindly apply the Anglo-Saxon version of TCT to East Asian contexts. Another one is to see guanxi as a uniquely Chinese phenomenon, a product of its Confucian philosophy (e.g., Chen, Chen & Huang, 2013 ). A more demanding, but also more promising, way to proceed is to attempt to see how the disconnect between the prediction of the theory and the empirical evidence can be used to modify and extend existing theories, making them more general (Shenkar, 2004 ). This is possible in the case of TCT because the theory posits that the chosen governance structure will be the one whose properties align with the characteristics of the transaction, with these characteristics in turn influenced by the institutional environment (Williamson, 2000 ). Hence applying TCT to different settings, especially non-Western ones, has the potential to enrich it and make it more robust. In our case, the task is to identify which features of the institutional environment make relation-based governance more efficient than rule-based governance (Hennart, 2015 ; Li, 2003 ; Li et al., 2004 ). Hennart ( 2015 ), for example, looks at how the characteristics of the networks in which transactions are embedded affect the costs of enforcing them. He notes that relational governance can be either bilateral or multilateral. Bilateral relational governance relies on mutual enforcement, and is based on appeals to friendship and on threats of discontinuing the relationship. One advantage of this solution over market contracts and multilateral relational governance is that one does not need to prove the existence of dishonest behavior to third parties. But this enforcement mechanism does require relationships to be long term, and hence works best when one can rely for a long period of time on a small number of geographically close partners. Multilateral relational governance relies on group reputation effects. These effects are stronger in closed networks of homogeneous members for which exit is costly. These considerations can be shown to explain not only the practice of guanxi in China, but also the use of bilateral and multilateral governance in countries such as the United States. Verbeke and Kano ( 2013 ) look at the wider, but related, phenomenon of “trading favors” and show how TCT can explain its occurrence, the form it takes, and its likely impact.
What is unique about IB research? Eden and Nielsen ( 2020 ) have argued that the field is particularly complex. Aguinis and Gabriel ( 2021 ) have responded that it is not necessarily any more complex than a number of other fields. We agree that differences in complexity between IB and domestic topics may have been overstated, but we also believe that IB researchers face some unique challenges, perhaps not due to complexity, but instead to the inadequate quantity and quality of data available and to the need to rethink the applicability of many of its imported theories in contexts that differ from the ones where they were originally elaborated.
We do not have the space to provide an extensive treatment of all the data problems faced by IB scholars. Instead, we point out to the serious issue of data equivalence in the collection of primary data. We briefly discuss how this affects interviews and surveys. We then turn to secondary data. In a recent article documenting their increasing importance in IB research, Cerar et al., ( 2021 : 1365) argue that such data needs to “be treated with the same healthy skepticism and quality checks as primary data” so as to mitigate ‘‘IB’s increasing exposure to the risks inherent in secondary data”. They note that a degree of complacency has crept into the use of such data: “references to the biases and weaknesses of such data are conspicuously absent in much of the literature. …. editors and reviewers do not consider the weaknesses and lack of mitigation possibilities inherent in secondary data as critical” (Cerar et al., 2021 : 1371). Our quick review of the pitfalls encountered in measuring just one IB construct – though a key one – the size of MNE activities outside their own country, certainly confirm their assessment. FDI flows and stocks (as epitomized by UNCTAD’s annual World Investment Report ) have been used to measure that activity at the country level without their authors seemingly aware of the limitations of such data. 22 We document the pitfalls involved and make some suggestions on how to avoid some of them.
Recently a number of firm-level databases, such as Orbis, have become available. While their broad coverage and user-friendly web interface hold out the promise of significantly improving our understanding of MNEs, we show that they are subject to some of the same problems that affect the use of FDI flow and stock data, and that the literature has not always recognized them. We suggest some partial fixes. The unavoidable conclusion from our brief foray into the use of both country-level FDI flow and stock data and firm-level data extracted from large databases is that data are a major challenge in IB.
IB researchers study phenomena in multiple contexts. Yet some of the theories they borrow were conceived by scholars working in specific environments and inevitably reflect those contexts. Often, they cannot be applied “as is” to the specific contexts being researched. Most theories used in IB were developed by scholars working in the United States and, to a lesser extent, the UK, Canada, and Australia, and hence reflect the cultural, economic, and social conditions of those countries. For that reason, their explanatory power is not always high when applied “as is” to other country contexts. In contrast to researchers in domestic fields trying to explain local phenomena with local theories, i.e., typically US phenomena with US theories, IB scholars have the challenging task of identifying the possible cultural biases of the theories they have borrowed and of extending them to fit other institutional contexts. Confronting theories to environments that differ from the ones in which they were originally developed offers the chance to enrich them by uncovering their hidden assumptions and boundary conditions, and to develop higher level, broader theories. Unfortunately, not all scholars have the confidence to tackle this challenge. Instead, some ignore the issue and simply try to apply, without modification, theories developed in Boston or San Francisco to Beijing or Singaporean contexts (see the discussion in Meyer, 2006 ). Others develop “indigenous theories” (Bruton, Zahra, Van de Ven, & Hitt, 2022). For example, some scholars have explained the relation-based governance prevalent in East Asia by Confucian philosophy, even though the use of this type of governance varies within the region and is also prevalent outside it (Li, 2013 ). Such indigenous theories fit the specific circumstances of their environment but remain unconnected to more general ones, resulting in a patchwork of incompatible theories. We have tried to show that identifying possible cultural biases in the theories we use and confronting them to diverse institutional environments can open new perspectives and enrich theories. IB scholars, who study different institutional environments, have unique opportunities to do so. But for this to happen a theory must have a built-in sensitivity to contextual differences (Muzio, 2021 ). We have shown that TCT is such a theory because it posits that the optimal governance structure depends on the specificities of the institutional environment and studies how this works out. It is therefore well equipped to accommodate different contexts. The result of the exercise, as we have attempted to show, is a version of TCT that is more general while remaining context-rich.
Is it fair to generalize from the specific data problems discussed in this article and argue that they are particularly daunting in IB? Are other theories used in IB less susceptible to cultural biases than our example of the Williamsonian version of TCT, or are those biases widespread? Is our unconscious use of theories that do not fit the varied contexts we study as big a limitation in IB as we argue it is? Are there other examples where IB researchers have used the disconnect between the empirical evidence and the predictions of borrowed theories as a lever to build more generalizable ones? Can all IB theories be leveraged in that way, as we have shown TCT can, or are other Western theories more context-specific, hence justifying an emphasis on indigenous theories, as advocated by Bruton et al. ( 2022 )? We hope our counterpoint will stimulate further debate on those issues.
We are not questioning the use of FDI data to measure equity flows between MNE parents and their subsidiaries, but only their use to measure the aggregate value added generated by these subsidiaries.
Enron’s 2000 10K filing provides a good example of that complexity. Dabhol, its ill-fated Indian power plant, was owned by a Mauritius SPE, itself owned by a Dutch SPE, itself owned by a Cayman Island SPE, which was then owned by a Delaware SPE, Enron India, LLC. So an observer looking at the first immediate owner could conclude that Dabhol was a domestic operation.
For a recent example, see Mariotti and Marzano’s ( 2021 ) study of the impact of changes in competition policy on the attractiveness of a country to foreign direct investors. They acknowledge the problems of using FDI data, but like Buckley et al. ( 2007 ), attempt to remedy them by omitting OFCs from their sample. This fix excludes genuine investments going to some of their omitted OFC (Hong Kong for example) but more importantly onward-journey investments from the eliminated OFCs to the countries that remain in their sample.
Available at https://stats.oecd.org/ and https://data.imf.org .
As an example, in the UNCTAD database Finnish FDI stocks were reported in 2013 on an historical-cost basis while US FDI stocks were on a market-value basis. Valuing FDI stocks on a historical cost basis results in an underestimation of the FDI stock of countries that are old investors relative to that of more recent investors (Bellak & Cantwell, 1996 ).
Zephyr also covers initial public offerings (IPOs), private equity, and venture capital deals.
Yang, Martins and Driffield ( 2013 ), for example, are able to build a sample of 16,000 MNEs operating in 46 countries over a 10-year period.
Over 95% of the US $3.5 trillion FDI stock in Luxembourg, 21% of US$1.45 trillion FDI stock in Switzerland, and 40% of US $1.97 trillion in the UK was sent to SPEs.
A search for subsidiaries active in NACE 6420, the most common code for SPEs, returned 23,908 subsidiaries in the Netherlands, 31,387 in Luxembourg, 1526 in Switzerland, and 21,589 in the UK, for a total of 78,440 SPE subsidiaries. For the 31 developed host countries included in Estrin et al. ( 2018 ), the total number of this type of SPE comes to 131,709. Limiting the number of such SPEs to those owned by the MNEs of the 14 advanced and emerging economy countries in the Estrin et al. ( 2018 ) sample does reduce the number of this type of SPE to 49,907, but this is still 3.1% of the total number of subsidiaries. On the other hand, if we choose a broader definition of SPEs as subsidiaries engaged in financial service activities (NACE 64) and insurance, reinsurance and pension funding (NACE 65), their number rises to 96,188, or 6% of all subsidiaries in their sample. This is too large a number to be overlooked.
Our estimation is based on the number of subsidiaries whose main activity is NACE 64 (financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding), NACE 65 (insurance and pension funding), NACE 66 (activities auxiliary to financial services and insurance activities), NACE 69 (legal and accounting activities) and NACE 77 (rental and leasing activities). It makes sense to include the latter category since many SPEs lease intellectual property to onshore Chinese operations.
As above, we define SPEs as subsidiaries whose main activity is in NACE 6420, investment holding companies. Looking at Orbis, we identified 5387 Chinese SPEs located in 49 different countries. The 1909 SPEs that were registered in 18 countries, including Singapore (1104), Luxembourg (489), the BVI (263), the Cayman Islands (11) and a few others, had a combined employee count of zero.
We searched recent articles that used Orbis to develop samples of MNEs by country of origin with ultimate ownership as a criterion and did not find any mention of special steps taken by their authors to account for inverted firms.
SPEs are not randomly distributed among all subsidiaries, so their inclusion causes more than noise: it may lead to bias. SPEs also make up a large share of all subsidiaries so the bias is not likely to disappear with an increase in sample size.
Linsi and Mügge ( 2019 ) document the poor quality of international statistics on merchandise and service trade and on portfolio investments. While accounting measures of firm profitability are fairly straightforward in a domestic context, they are problematic in IB because the published financial performance of a foreign subsidiary is affected by the firm’s internal transfer rules.
Adjusted means that in the case of jointly authored articles, the score attributed to an author is divided by the number of authors of the article. The dominance of scholars in those four countries lessened slightly to 63.8% in the 2001–2015 period, but is still high. The non-adjusted percentages for authors in the Journal of International Business Studies is similar – 74.9% in 1995–2004 and 63.9 in 2004–2014 (Cantwell, Piepenbrink, Shukla, & Vo, 2016 ).
We thank an anonymous referee for raising this point.
The topic has been recently the subject of a point-counterpoint in the Journal of Management Studies . See Filatotchev, Ireland, & Stahl ( 2022 ) and Bruton, Zahra, Van de Ven & Hitt (2022).
https://hofstede-insights.com . Accessed October 25, 2021.
There are some exceptions. Social exchange theory is attributed to George Homans, an American sociologist. We thank an anonymous referee for this insight.
This dichotomy between personal and business transactions seems rooted in the US culture with its emphasis on separation. Boyacigiller and Adler (1991: 276) note that “Americans low context orientation also underlies their concept of separation, for example, separation of church and state”.
Williamson was aware of the existence of social constraints. In Williamson ( 1985 : 120–122) he briefly describes Toyota subcontracting practices and concludes that “the hazards of trading are less severe in Japan than in the United States because of cultural and institutional checks on opportunism”. But he did not incorporate such constraints in his model.
In unpublished work, Beugelsdijk, Hennart, Slangen and Smeets surveyed the empirical articles published in main IB journals between 1981 and 2008 that use FDI data to measure MNE subsidiary activity. Only three of the 47 articles surveyed mention some of the data limitations we identify in this article. None of them mention them all.
Aguinis, H., & Gabriel, K. 2021. International business studies: Are we really so uniquely complex? Journal of International Business Studies . https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-02-00462-x .
Article Google Scholar
Aïssaoui, R., Geringer, J., & Livanis, G. 2020. International collaboration and European contributions to International Business research. Management International Review, 60(6): 827–868.
Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. 1986. Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3): 1–26.
Anderson, J., & Sutherland, D. 2015. Developed economy investment promotion agencies and emerging market foreign direct investment: The case of Chinese FDI in Canada. Journal of World Business, 50(4): 815–825.
Aykut, D., Sanghi, A., & Kosmidou, G. 2017. What to do when foreign direct investment is not direct or foreign: FDI round tripping. Policy research working paper 8046, Macroeconomics and Fiscal Management Global Practice Group, World Bank Group . Washington DC: World Bank.
Bellak, C., & Cantwell, J. 1996. Foreign direct investment – how much is it worth? Comment on S.J. Gray and A.M. Rugman. Transnational Corporations, 5(1): 85–97.
Beugelsdijk, S., Hennart, J.-F., Slangen, A., & Smeets, R. 2010. Why and how FDI stocks are a biased measure of MNE affiliate activity. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9): 1444–1459.
Borga, M. & Caliandro, C. 2018. Eliminating the pass-through: towards FDI statistics that better capture the financial and economic linkages between countries. Working paper 25029, National Bureau of Economic Research. Washington DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Boyacigiller, N., & Adler, N. 1988. The provincial dinosaur: organizational science in a global context. Academy of Management Review, 16(2): 264–290.
Brickley, J., & Dark, F. 1987. The choice of organizational form: the case of franchising. Journal of Financial Economics, 18(2): 401–420.
Bruno, R., Campos, N., & Estrin, S. 2021a. The effect on foreign direct investment of membership in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(4): 802–821.
Bruno, R. L., Crescenzi, R., Estrin, S., & Petralia, S. 2021b. Multinationals, innovation, and institutional context: IPR protection and distance effects. Journal of International Business Studies . https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00452-z .
Bruton, G., Zahra, S., Van de Ven, A., & Hitt, M. 2022. Indigenous theory uses, abuses, and future. Journal of Management Studies, 59(4): 1057–1073.
Buckley, P., Clegg, J. L., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. 2007. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 499–518.
Buckley, P., Clegg, J. L., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. 2017. A retrospective and agenda for future research on Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(1): 1–20.
Cantwell, J. 1992. The methodological problems raised by the collection of foreign direct investment data. Scandinavian International Business Review, 1(16): 86–102.
Cantwell, J., Piepenbrink, A., Shukla, P., & Vo, A. 2016. The changing landscape of JIBS authorship. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(7): 744–777.
Casanova, C., Garcia-Herrero, A. & Xia, L. 2015. Chinese outbound foreign direct investment: how much goes where after round tripping and offshoring? Banca Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria Research Working Paper no. 15/17, June.
Cerar, J., Nell, P., & Reiche, B. 2021. The declining share of primary data and the neglect of the individual level in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(7): 1365–1374.
Chen, C., Chen, X., & Huang, S. 2013. Chinese guanxi: an integrative review and new directions for future research. Management and Organization Review, 9(1): 167–207.
Cuypers, I., Hennart, J.-F., Silverman, B., & Ertug, K. 2021. Transaction cost theory: Past progress, current challenges, and suggestions for the future. Academy of Management Annals, 15(1): 111–150.
Damgaard, J., Elkjaer, T., & Johannesen, N. 2019. What is real and what is not in the global FDI network. IMF working paper 19/274. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
David, R., & Han, S. 2004. A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strategic Management Journal, 25(1): 39–58.
De Jong, G., & van Houten, J. 2014. The impact of MNE cultural diversity on the internationalization-performance relationship. Theory and evidence from European multinational enterprises. International Business Review, 23(1): 313–326.
De Jong, P., Greeven, M., & Ebbers, H. 2017. Getting the numbers right on China’s actual overseas investment: The case of the Netherlands. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 46(1): 187–209.
Dunning, J. 1993. Multinational enterprises and the global economy . Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley.
Eden, L., & Nielsen, B. 2020. Research methods in international business: The challenge of complexity. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(9): 1609–1620.
Estrin, S., Meyer, K., & Pelletier, A. 2018. Emerging Economy MNEs: How does home country munificence matter? Journal of World Business, 53(4): 514–528.
Filatotchev, I., Ireland, R., & Stahl, G. 2022. Contextualizing management research: An open system perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 59(4): 1036–1056.
Haberly, D., & Wójcik, D. 2015. Tax havens and the production of offshore FDI: An empirical analysis. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(1): 75–101.
Habib, M., & Zurawicki, L. 2002. Corruption and foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2): 291–307.
Harzing, A.-W., & Metz, I. 2013. Practicing what we preach: The geographic diversity of editorial boards. Management International Review, 53(2): 169–187.
Hennart, J.-F. 1982. A theory of multinational enterprise . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Hennart, J.-F. 1993. Explaining the swollen middle: Why most transactions are a mix of market and hierarchy. Organization Science, 4(4): 529–548.
Hennart, J.-F. 2009. Down with MNE-centric theories! Market entry and expansion as the bundling of MNE and local assets. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1432–1454.
Hennart, J. F. 2012. Emerging market multinationals and the theory of the multinational enterprise. Global Strategy Journal, 2(3): 168–187.
Hennart, J.-F. 2015. Leveraging Asian institutions to deepen theory: A transaction cost perspective on relational governance. Asian Business and Management, 14(4): 257–282.
Hofstede, G. 1993. Cultural constraints on management theories. Academy of Management Executive, 7(1): 81–94.
Hult, G., Ketchen, D., Griffith, D., Finnegan, C., Gonzalez-Padron, T., Hammancioglu, N., Huang, Y., Talay, M., & Cavusgil, T. 2008. Data equivalence in cross-cultural international business research: Assessment and guidelines. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6): 1027–1044.
Jindra, B., Hassan, S., & Cantner, U. 2016. What does location choice reveal about knowledge-seeking strategies of emerging market multinationals in the EU? International Business Review, 25(1): 204–220.
Jones, C., & Temouri, Y. 2016. The determinants of tax haven FDI. Journal of World Business, 51(2): 237–250.
Jones, G. 1996. The evolution of international business . London: Routledge.
Jones, G. 2000. Merchants to multinationals . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kalotay, K. 2012. Indirect FDI. Journal of World Investment and Trade, 13(4): 542–555.
Karhunen, P., Ledyaeva, S., & Brouthers, K. 2021. Capital round-tripping: Determinants of emerging market firm investments into offshore financial centers and their ethical implications. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04908-y .
Toyo Keizai. 2022. Kaigai shinshutsu kigyou souran. Tokyo: Toyo Keizai.
Kerner, A. 2014. What we talk about when we talk about foreign direct investment. International Studies Quarterly, 58(4): 804–815.
Kim, H., Wu, J., Schuler, D., & Hoskisson, R. 2020. Chinese multinationals’ fast internationalization: Financial performance advantage in one region, disadvantage in another. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(7): 1076–1106.
Kwok, C., & Tadesse, S. 2006. The MNC as an agent of change for host-country institutions: FDI and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6): 767–785.
Lehmann, A., Sayek, S., & Kang, H. 2004. Multinational affiliates and local financial markets. IMF working paper 04/107. Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund. Available at ssrn.com/abstract=584941.
Li, J. S. 2003. Relation-based vs rule-based governance: An explanation of the East Asian miracle and crisis. Review of International Economics, 11(4): 651–673.
Li, S. 2013. China’s (painful) transition from relation-based to rule-based governance: When and how, not if and why. Corporate Governance: an International Review, 31(1): 1–11.
Li, S., Park, S.-H., & Li, S. 2004. The great leap forward: The transition from relation-based governance to rule-based governance. Organizational Dynamics, 33(1): 63–78.
Li, X., & Liu, X. 2005. Foreign direct investment and economic growth: An increasingly endogenous relationship. World Development, 33(3): 393–407.
Liang, H., Ren, B., & Sun, S. 2015. An anatomy of state control in the globalization of state-owned enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(2): 223–240.
Linsi, L., & Mügge, S. 2019. Globalization and the growing defects of international economic statistics. Review of International Political Economy, 26(3): 361–383.
Lu, J., & Beamish, P. 2004. International diversification and firm performance: the S curve hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4): 598–609.
Mariotti, S., & Marzano, R. 2021. The effect of competition policy, regulatory quality and trust on inward FDI in host countries. International Business Review, 30(6): 1–12.
Meyer, K. 2006. Asian management research needs more confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(2): 119–137.
Michael, S. 2000. The effect of organizational form on quality: The case of franchising. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43(3): 295–318.
Michailova, S., & Worm, V. 2003. Personal networking in Russia and China: Blat and Guanxi . European Management Journal, 21(4): 509–519.
Muzio, D. 2021. Re-conceptualizing management theory: How do we move away from Western-centered knowledge? Journal of Management Studies, 59(4): 1032–1035.
Padmanabhan, P., & Cho, K. 1996. Ownership strategy for a foreign affiliate: an empirical investigation of Japanese firms. Management International Review, 36(1): 45–65.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2000. Report on the survey of implementation of methodological standards for direct investment, Appendix II, glossary of foreign investment terms. Paris, OECD. www.imf.org/external/bopage/pdf/mar2000.pdf
Sauvant, K. 2017. Beware of FDI statistics. Columbia FDI Perspectives 215, December 18.
Shenkar, O. 2004. One more time: international business in a global economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2): 161–171.
Sigler, T., Martinus, K., Iacopini, I., & Derudder, B. 2020. The role of tax havens and offshore financial centres in shaping corporate geographies: an industry sector perspective. Regional Studies, 54(5): 621–633.
Standiford, S., & Marshall, R. 2000. The transaction cost advantage of guanxi -based business practices. Journal of World Business, 35(1): 21–42.
Sutherland, D., & Anderson, J. 2015. The pitfalls of using foreign direct investment data to measure Chinese multinational enterprise activity. China Quarterly, 221: 21–48.
Sutherland, D., Hennart, J.-F., & Anderson, J. 2019. How does the routing of FDI to and via tax havens confound our understanding of Chinese MNE identity? Asian Business and Management, 18(5): 337–359.
Tallman, S., & Li, J. 1996. Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1): 179–196.
Triandis, H. 1972. The analysis of subjective culture . New York: Wiley.
Triandis, H. 1993. Collectivism and individualism as cultural syndromes. Cross-Cultural Research, 27(3–4): 155–180.
UNCTAD. 2013. World Investment Report 2013—Methodological Note . Available at https://unctad.org/en/PublicationChapters/wir2013chMethodNote_en.pdf . Accessed 20 October 2021.
UNCTAD. 2016. World investment report 2016. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
Velez-Calle, A., Robledo-Arilla, C., & Rodriguez-Rios, J. 2015. On the influence of interpersonal relations on business practices in Latin America: A comparison with the Chinese guanxi and the Arab wasta . Thunderbird International Business Review, 57(4): 281–293.
Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. 2013. The transaction cost economics (TCE) theory of trading favors. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(2): 409–431.
Whichard, O. 2008. Multiple indicators for multiple uses: United States statistics on foreign direct investment. Paper presented at the 7th OECD Global Forum on International Investment , 27-28th March.
Wieserma, M., & Bowen, H. 2011. The relationship between international diversification and firm performance: Why it remains a puzzle. Global Strategy Journal, 1(1): 152–170.
Wilkins, M. 1997. The conceptual domain of international business. In B. Toyne and D. Night, (Eds.), International Business: An emerging vision. Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press.
Williamson, O. 1991. Economic institutions: Spontaneous and intentional governance. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 7(special issue): 159-187.
Williamson, O. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications . New York: Free Press.
Williamson, O. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting . New York: Free Press.
Williamson, O. 1993a. Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 36(April): 453–486.
Williamson, O. 1993b. Transaction cost economics and organization theory. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2(2): 107–156.
Williamson, O. 2000. The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3): 595–613.
Xiao, G. 2004. People’s Republic of China round tripping FDI: Scale, causes, and implications. Latin American/Caribbean and Asian/Pacific Economics and Business Association Working Paper 24, December.
Yang, M. 1994. Gifts, favors and banquets: The art of social relationships in China . Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Yang, Y., Martins, P. S., & Driffield, N. 2013. Multinational performance and the geography of FDI: evidence from 46 Countries. Management International Review, 53(6): 763–794.
Zahra, S. 2003. International expansion of US manufacturing family businesses: the effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4): 495–512.
Zhou, L., & Leung, D. 2015. China’s overseas investment explained in 10 graphics. World Resources Institute, January 28. www.wri.org/insights/chinas-overseas-investments-explained-in-10-graphics
We thank the editor, Alain Verbeke, and the anonymous reviewers for their stimulating comments.
Authors and affiliations.
Tilburg University, Heuvelstraat 14, 5131AP, Alphen, The Netherlands
Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Department of Management and Marketing, Durham University, Mill Hill Lane, Durham, DH1 4LT, UK
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Jean-François Hennart .
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Accepted by Alain Verbeke, Editor-in-Chief, 14 August 2022. This article has been with the authors for one revision.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .
Reprints and Permissions
About this article
Hennart, JF., Sutherland, D. International business research: The real challenges are data and theory. J Int Bus Stud 53 , 2068–2087 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00566-y
Received : 30 November 2021
Revised : 27 May 2022
Accepted : 14 August 2022
Published : 30 October 2022
Issue Date : December 2022
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00566-y
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- transaction cost theory
- foreign direct investment
- international business data
- international business theory
- Find a journal
- Publish with us